Hot work whilst working at height in a confined space – job was stopped
- Safety Flash
- Published on 19 February 2024
- Generated on 10 July 2026
- IMCA SF 04/24
- 2 minute read
A third-party contractor’s welder was standing on the wooden platform (the actual height was over 1.80m) inside a confined space.
What happened?
During a site visit to a vessel, it was observed that a third-party contractor’s welder was standing on the wooden platform (the actual height was over 1.80m) inside a confined space (a ballast tank) doing some flame-cutting jobs. No fall protection guards were installed around the worker, not was the worker wearing fall arrest equipment.
Welder’s initial position without any fall protection
Temporary solution (full body harness attached to the tripod system with inertia reel)
The job was stopped immediately and a temporary alternative working method was arranged where the worker wore a full body harness attached to with an inertia reel to a tripod.
What went wrong?
- The personnel authorizing these activities – working at height doing hot work within a confined space:
- Made no Permit to Work application for hot work nor for working at height nor for working in a confined space.
- Did not conduct a review of the risk assessment for the task in hand.
- Inadequate supervision: there was no proper Control of Work by vessel crew or management at the site before the job started, and no ongoing verification of safe working as the job continued.
- There was a lack of hazard appreciation and risk perception by the persons involved; it took someone coming in from outside, observing the job, to actually stop it.
- It was easy to work unsafely: crew members misunderstood differing internal company procedural requirements for working at height.
- Various hazards were not recognised at all. Had the worker fallen within the tank, protruding metal elements meant that there was high potential for a very serious injury.
Actions taken locally
- Reiteration of importance of thorough Risk Assessment, Permit to Work process, and Control of Work, including regular monitoring.
- Ensured more robust control of Working at Height activities and prioritized availability of engineering controls (e.g. a scaffolding platform).
Related Safety Flashes
-
IMCA SF 19/20
23 June 2020
-
-
IMCA SF 10/21
8 April 2021
-
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.