Unsafe transportation and packing arrangements
- Safety Flash
- Published on 24 October 2022
- Generated on 26 July 2026
- IMCA SF 23/22
- 2 minute read
One of our members has recently experienced two near miss incidents, resulting from the inadequate packing of goods during transportation with the potential for more significant consequences and injury.
Common factors from these recent near miss incidents:
- Packing conditions of project equipment were inadequate to provide appropriate containment and support of the equipment and goods during transportation and handling.
- Transportation and packing activities were subcontracted to third parties.
- Specified and appropriate packing instructions were not implemented.
- The obligation to exercise the Stop work authority was applicable in both cases, but was only applied in one.
Post Incident #1 – showing wooden crates damage
Post Incident #1 – showing new packaging specification implemented
Post Incident #2 – showing how plastic sheeting failed to maintain pads on pallets
Post Incident #2 – showing appropriate wooden crates on pallets to take the load
What went wrong?
- Work Planning
- The full transportation process was not properly considered.
- There was a lack of formal and appropriate packing instructions.
- Risk Assessment/Risk Perception
- Multiple opportunities were missed, throughout the transportation process – and specifically at load out – to identify that the packing arrangements were inadequate for safe transportation.
- Quality Assurance and Verification
- There was a lack of verification of the process and procedures to control packing and transportation during the vendor approval process.
- Supervision – Failure to consistently implement the stop work obligation.
Recommendations
- Take into account the whole process of transportation from start to end. This requires packing the load in appropriate conditions to satisfy all transport activities from load out to off load.
- Ensure formal packing instructions are fit for purpose.
- Ensure packing instructions and expectations are communicated to third parties’ subcontractors in a timely manner, prior to packing and transportation activities.
- If it’s unsafe – STOP THE JOB: Communicate clearly the understanding that all parties including subcontractors have the obligation and expectation to exercise stop work authority when required.
Related safety flashes
-
IMCA SF 19/22
26 July 2022
-
IMCA SF 33/21
2 December 2021
-
IMCA SF 10/17
12 May 2017
-
-
IMCA SF 23/21
19 August 2021
-
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.