Two cases of hand injuries – UK HSE
- Safety Flash
- Published on 2 August 2017
- Generated on 22 February 2025
- IMCA SF 19/17
- 4 minute read
Jump to:
IMCA members continue to report significant numbers of hand and finger injuries. Here we discuss two such incidents recently reported by the UK's Health and Safety Executive (HSE).
Incident 1: Worker Injures Hand on Lathe
What happened
THE UK Health & Safety Executive (HSE) reports that an engineering firm was sentenced after a worker suffered injuries to his hand. A worker was polishing a metal shaft on a lathe using emery cloth, while wearing gloves. The glove appeared to snag and dragged his hand towards the rotating shaft. As a result of the incident he had stitches in his hand and dislocated his scaphoid bone – part of his wrist.
What went wrong/causes
The injured person had only been working for four days at the site.
The HSE investigation found that:
- No suitable and sufficient assessments had been carried out to determine control measures for this task of polishing.
- There were no clear guidelines for employees and others, such as agency workers, on safe ways to polish.
The HSE inspector commented: “Those in control of work have a responsibility to devise safe methods of working and to provide the necessary information, instruction and training to their workers in the safe system of working. This incident could so easily have been avoided by simply carrying out correct control measures and safe working practices.”
Incident 2: Workers exposed to Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS)
What happened
THE UK Health & Safety Executive (HSE) reports that an engineering firm has been fined for failing to control the risk of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) to employees using hand-held power tools. A welder who had been working at the company for a number of years had been given a job that involved a significant amount of grinding and polishing. After some hours on the task, the worker began to experience numbness and tingling. He asked to swap with another worker but was told to carry on.
Whilst his symptoms continued he was told by his supervisor to carry on using vibrating tools. A few weeks later, a 20-year-old apprentice welder also began to suffer from vibration-related symptoms from using similar tools.
What went wrong/causes
The company failed to adequately control the risks to its employees from exposure to vibration. The company also failed to ensure its employees were given sufficient information, instruction and training on the effects of working with vibrating hand tools.
The HSE inspector said: “This is a case of the company failing to protect workers using vibrating tools. Exposure to hand-arm vibration is a well-known risk which the company failed to adequately control. The company also failed to ensure workers were looked after when symptoms did arise leading to further exposure. This was wholly inadequate, and led to two employees suffering significant health effects.”
Members are encouraged to bring to the attention of their crews the IMCA safety promotional materials on hand safety and other topics, available free to members. See https://www.imca-int.com/core/hsse/publications/safety-promotion/
Hand and finger injuries comprise a significant proportion of all the incidents reported by IMCA members and, in many cases, the root causes of the injuries – as in these cases – are failure to assess risk or properly manage change, or failure to provide a safe system of work.
Members may wish to review the following incident:
In summary
IMCA members continue to report signification numbers of hand and finger injuries. They can be broadly divided into two categories:
- firstly, incidents/injuries in which the use of hand tools was a causal factor, and
- secondly, finger nips and crush injuries caused when moving large or heavy objects from one place to another (which is a core task for anyone operating vessels and hence for most IMCA members).
Related safety flashes
-
IMCA SF 28/16
18 October 2016
-
IMCA SF 28/16
18 October 2016
-
IMCA SF 08/16
13 April 2016
-
IMCA SF 04/16
5 February 2016
-
IMCA SF 12/15
28 August 2015
-
IMCA SF 15/14
8 September 2014
-
IMCA SF 16/13
17 October 2013
-
IMCA SF 05/13
4 April 2013
-
IMCA SF 11/12
26 October 2012
-
IMCA SF 09/12
4 September 2012
-
IMCA SF 05/11
29 June 2011
-
IMCA SF 03/09
5 March 2009
-
IMCA SF 02/08
4 February 2008
-
IMCA SF 03/05
1 March 2005
-
IMCA SF 09/03
1 August 2003
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.