Inadvertent activation of condensed aerosol fire extinguishing system leads to a fatality

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 1 June 2020
  • Generated on 11 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 17/20
  • 3 minute read

The UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) has issued Safety Bulletin SB1/2020 highlighting a potentially serious hazard, associated with condensed aerosol firefighting suppressant particles after a fatal accident on fishing vessel Resurgam.

What happened?

Fishing vessel Resurgam was alongside undergoing maintenance.

An engineer and an apprentice from the owners shore-based support team were working on the main engine in the engine room.

Also working in the engine room were two contractors who were installing a new FirePro condensed aerosol fire extinguishing system. 

During the installation, the fire extinguishing system partially and inadvertently discharged without warning, filling the engine room with a dense cloud of aerosol fire suppressing particles. 

Both the installation contractors and the company’s engineer managed to evacuate, but the apprentice collapsed in the engine room. He was later recovered by the local fire and rescue service, but found not breathing, and could not be resuscitated.

The UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) has issued Safety Bulletin SB1/2020 highlighting a potentially serious hazard, associated with condensed aerosol firefighting suppressant particles after a fatal accident on fishing vessel Resurgam.

What were the causes? What went wrong?

The MAIB notes that “the exact causes and circumstances of this accident are still being investigated, and the findings will be published by the MAIB in a full investigation report. However, during the inadvertent discharge, it is evident that the apprentice inhaled a high concentration of the suppressant particles and this contributed significantly to the fatality.”

The manufacturer’s “Installation and User Manual and its product’s material safety data sheets had recognised the inadvertent discharge of the system, particularly during installation and maintenance, as a hazard. However, the loss of life was not identified as a potential outcome; therefore, the risk associated with inhaling or ingesting a large volume of the suppressant particles was not fully appreciated or protected against.”

Actions

The MAIB recommends that “vessel owners, operators and those contracted to install FirePro and other similar condensed aerosol fire extinguishing systems should be fully aware of the potential risk to life from exposure to the aerosol particles.

Safety precautions should be put in place to ensure that personnel are not exposed to this hazard:

  • Prior to intentional discharge of a condensed aerosol system, there should be visible and audible alarms to alert personnel. Checks should also be made to ensure the protected compartment has been evacuated before the system is activated.
  • When condensed aerosol fire extinguishing systems are being installed or maintained the system should be fully isolated to guard against inadvertent activation, non-essential personnel should be clear of the area and an enclosed space rescue plan should be in place.Fishing vessel Resurgam was alongside undergoing maintenance. An engineer and an apprentice from the owners shore-based support team were working on the main engine in the engine room. Also working in the engine room were two contractors who were installing a new FirePro condensed aerosol fire extinguishing system. During the installation, the fire extinguishing system partially and inadvertently discharged without warning, filling the engine room with a dense cloud of aerosol fire suppressing particles. Both the installation contractors and the company’s engineer managed to evacuate, but the apprentice collapsed in the engine room. He was later recovered by the local fire and rescue service, but found not breathing, and could not be resuscitated.

Members may wish to refer to:

  • Failure of fixed high expansion foam [MAIB]
  • Fixed CO2 fire extinguishing systems – US Coast Guard alert

Latest Safety Flashes:

LTI: Finger injury during emergency recovery of ROV

A worker suffered a serious finger injury when their finger was caught between a crane wire and the recovery hook on an ROV.

Read more
BSEE: recurring hand injuries from alternative cutting devices

The United States Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has published Safety Alert 487.

Read more
NTSB: Crane wire failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
Hot work performed outside of Permit to Work (PTW) boundary limit

A near miss occurred when a third-party contractor working removed a trip hazard from the vessel main deck, using a cutting torch and grinding disc.

Read more
Vital safety information (height of vehicle) found incorrect

“Height of vehicle” information displayed on a truck, was found to be incorrect.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.