Incidents of failure of jet drives on wind farm service vessels

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 19 July 2013
  • Generated on 1 May 2026
  • IMCA SF 12/13
  • 3 minute read

A Member has reported a number of incidents involving jet drives on wind farm service vessels.

Incident 1: Loss of Jet Drive Control on Wind Farm Service Vessel

A wind farm service vessel lost control of its jet drives. The incident occurred when a wind farm service vessel was underway returning to port from the wind farm. Control of the port jet was lost and the vessel veered heavily to port. The port jet was shut down and the vessel returned to base on one engine escorted by another wind farm service vessel.

Our Member’s investigation revealed the following: . An M6 size bolt, securing the steering feedback transducer plate to the end of the steering ram, had vibrated loose and fallen off into the bilge; . This resulted in a loss of steering control of the unit.

Our Member took the following action and learnt the following lessons:

  • The steering feedback transducer plate was reconnected and LocTite or similar used on the nut and bolt.

  • The repair operation could have been conducted offshore without returning to port.

  • When the rams are disconnected from the transducer plate for maintenance purposes, the nut and bolt should be secured with an agent like LocTite or similar to prevent the bolt from vibrating loose.

  • Wind farm vessel crews should have a thorough technical understanding of the vessels they are using.
transducer plate secured correctly to ram

transducer plate secured correctly to ram

transducer plate secured correctly to ram transducer plate unsecured and steering ram retracted

transducer plate secured correctly to ram transducer plate unsecured and steering ram retracted

Incident 2: Failure of Jet Drive on Start-up

Before starting the jets, before starting the day’s operations, it was found that the starboard jet failed to respond. Initial fault finding consisted of shutting down and restarting the starboard jet and changing over the relays. This did not work. An attempt was then made to manoeuvre using the local solenoid control – this did work. Following local control, the jet operated normally on all control systems and operations were resumed. As a result, the vessel was 45 minutes late for operations.

Our Member’s investigation revealed that:

  • The gearbox had been maintained earlier in the week.

  • The jet had performed for 45 minutes since the gearbox was serviced.

  • Use of the local solenoid control restored the system to operation.

  • The cause of the incident was suspected air within the system.

Our Member recommended that:

  • Knowledge of the local control is included as part of the emergency procedures in the company competence programme.

  • Wind farm service vessel skippers should be aware of the possibility of using local control systems.

  • The use of local control systems should be part of ‘routine’ fault finding.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Failure of moonpool railing system caused man overboard situation in moonpool

A crew member was working in the moonpool area when they lost balance and fell in but managed to grab hold of the guidewire, preventing an uncontrolled fall into the sea.

Read more
Diver entanglement – uncontrolled equipment in the water column

A diver hung a rubber mat with welding rods connected with a rope and carabiner to the rope suspending the welding cables resulting in a compromised work area.

Read more
Diver entanglement – umbilical caught around an anode

A diver’s umbilical got caught around an anode attached to a conductor shaft at 18 msw.

Read more
Unsecured sheave pin fell from crane

A sheave pin weighing 1.3 kg was found on deck.

Read more
Heaving line snap-back causes injury
Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.