Near-miss during heavy lift operations

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 31 October 2005
  • Generated on 26 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 10/05
  • 2 minute read

A Member has reported a near-miss incident that occurred during a dual crane lift of a stinger being offloaded from a barge.

What happened?

Two cranes were required to unload a stinger from a barge. Since the lift was a multiple crane lift and more than 100 T, a critical lift method statement (CLMS) was required prior to the lifting operation. The HS&E supervisor was asked to inspect and arrange for sign-off of the CLMS checklist and verification sheet. The HS&E supervisor then requested a control and compliance verification as indicated in the CLMS. After inspecting the area and verifying that everything appeared to be okay, the rigging superintendent/crane operator signed-off on the CLMS and the lift commenced.

While the lift was in progress, the yard fabrication superintendent arrived and asked to review the CLMS. A check with the rigging superintendent revealed that the actual weights being lifted exceeded the weights listed on the CLMS and that, as a result, the cranes were procedurally inappropriate for the lift, having inappropriate counterweights. Subsequent to this, it was discovered that no critical lift meeting had taken place prior to the lift, as required by procedures, and that the weight of the stinger was incorrectly estimated as 140 T rather than 160 T.

The rigging superintendent then instructed the rigging supervisor and crane operator to manoeuvre each end of the boom load closer to acquire and maintain the proper boom angle for a safe lift. The lift continued until completed using this method.

Lessons learnt

The company involved has noted a number of key factors leading to this potential incident, including:

  • lack of judgment and improper examples set on the part of supervisor level staff

  • inadequate review of work instructions, procedures and standards before the job

  • improper loading of cranes.

The company has reiterated that the failure to follow clearly established procedures during complex heavy lifts has the potential for serious incidents to occur.

Latest Safety Flashes:

Structural failure of rescue boat

A rescue boat suffered a catastrophic structural failure whilst unattended on the davit.

Read more
High potential: spontaneous opening of hydraulic release shackle (HRS) pin

During lifting operations on a vessel, a hydraulic release shackle pin opened on its own.

Read more
NTSB: diesel generator engine failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
LTI: fall from height during anchor chain handling operation

A worker fell through an opening from one deck to another, and was injured as a result.

Read more
Sudden disconnection of pressurised hose

A contractor was performing maintenance on the bulk cargo methanol system on deck of a vessel.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.