High potential LTI: Rigger ear injury

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 6 March 2020
  • Generated on 24 December 2024
  • IMCA SF 09/20
  • 3 minute read

A crew member suffered a serious ear injury whilst removing some temporary rigging suspended from a crane gantry walkway. The incident could have been much more serious; the potential was for a critical injury or fatality.

What happened?

A vessel was alongside demobilising when a crewman went up onto the crane gantry walkway to remove some temporary rigging. In doing so, he kneeled and put his head close to the handrailing.

The steel access ladders of the crane cab, which moves with the crane as it slews, pushed his head against the railing upright. As he pulled back hard to free himself from being trapped part of his left ear was severed.

The steel access ladders of the crane cab, which moves with the crane as it slews, pushed the crew member's head against the railing upright
As the crew member pulled back hard to free himself from being trapped, part of his left ear was severed

What went wrong?

Findings were:

  • Lack of situational awareness/perception of risk.
  • Ineffective communication and coordination protocol between the deck team and crane operator for access control to crane gantry.
  • Ineffective assessment of hazards associated with on-site modification when introducing the temporary rigging.
  • Bypassing warning signs and barriers by the crewman.

What actions were taken?

  • Standardise signage and barriers around crane structures or other areas with large moving machinery.
  • Ensure lifting procedures outline minimum requirements for communication and coordination protocol for lifting operations.
  • Consistent use of dynamic risk assessment to identify risks arising from potential hazards in the ongoing and changing circumstances of work activities – this means asking what’s changed and how this affects actions taken and instructions given.
  • Review of control measures in place around crane access/areas with large moving machinery e.g. guarding, walkways, cameras, alarms, barriers.
  • Consider whether suitable vessel-specific task risk assessments are in place for access to cranes and other areas of moving machinery and that these are well communicated to personnel e.g. during vessel, deck, ROV and dive system familiarisations and walkarounds.
  • Ensure that changes, such as installation of small items of temporary rigging, are fully considered and risk assessed as part of a documented management of change (MoC).
  • Use IOGP Life Saving Rules as a prompt whilst using risk management tools (TRA/TBT/MOC) – consider what Life Saving Rules are relevant to the task in hand.

Members may wish to refer to:

  • Near-miss: Personnel almost caught between crane house and scaffold pipe
  • Crush injury to hand while attempting to secure crane hook
  • Transferee stepping from gangway to staircase during rotation [of gangway
Engineered control – drum trolley and wheel – implemented on this vessel to remove people from the hazard

Members may wish to refer to;

  • Line of fire/pinch point – fractured fingers
  • Line of fire LTI: Finger injury during lifting operations
  • Lacerated finger during rigging operations

Latest Safety Flashes:

Structural failure of rescue boat

A rescue boat suffered a catastrophic structural failure whilst unattended on the davit.

Read more
High potential: spontaneous opening of hydraulic release shackle (HRS) pin

During lifting operations on a vessel, a hydraulic release shackle pin opened on its own.

Read more
NTSB: diesel generator engine failure

The National Transportation Safety Board of the United States (NTSB) published "Safer Seas Digest 2023".

Read more
LTI: fall from height during anchor chain handling operation

A worker fell through an opening from one deck to another, and was injured as a result.

Read more
Sudden disconnection of pressurised hose

A contractor was performing maintenance on the bulk cargo methanol system on deck of a vessel.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.