Tug capsized during operations

  • Safety Flash
  • Published on 27 September 2010
  • Generated on 5 April 2026
  • IMCA SF 06/10
  • 3 minute read

A Member reports an incident in which a tug girted and capsized during towing operations. 

What happened?

A third-party contractor’s tug was acting as a stern tug for a heavily laden barge arriving in port. The master of the stern tug chose to deploy the towline over the stern of his vessel, and intended to maintain position and heading relative to the barge by using the tug’s engines. A bridle (Gob) wire was not rigged. As the lead tug increased speed, the master of the stern tug found that he was unable to effectively control the yawing of his tug, and five minutes after connecting to the barge, the vessel took a large sheer to starboard, girted and capsized. The crew escaped without injury.

Diagram of the towing arrangement

Our Member conducted an investigation and noted the following:

  • For a conventional tug, towing over the stern, particularly while running astern, is an inherently unstable mode of operation.
  • The towing speed was too high in this instance.
  • The lack of a bridle wire or ‘gob rope’ meant there was no physical safety device to prevent the tug from girting when directional control was lost.
  • The tug’s master had not been trained in the use of the emergency brake release, had not tested it or witnessed its effect, and could not operate it from the bridge when the tug got into difficulties.
  • There had been no prior toolbox talk or discussion between the pilot and the tug masters regarding the entry of the barge into the port, and the pilot was unaware of the intended towing method or operational limitations of the stern tug.
  • Crew were working an 18 hour ‘changeover’ period in breach of the relevant working time regulations.
  • The tug masters’ knowledge and experience were never assessed by the third-party owner, and there was no formal staff training program.

Our Member drew the following lessons:

  • There should be prior discussion of scope of work between project manager and vessel owners, and between masters and pilots, to ensure suitability of vessels and crews, and full understanding of the task at hand.
  • Clear instructions on operational procedures should be provided to all personnel involved in operations.
  • Risk assessments and toolbox talks involving all relevant parties should be carried out prior to all towing operations.
  • Personnel should be familiar with emergency brake release systems on tugs and test it or witness its effect.
  • There should be appropriate implementation and understanding of working time regulations.
  • Towing over the stern:
    • Speed should be kept at an appropriate minimum, not more than 3 knots, when a tug with conventional propulsion (single or double) is acting as a stern (steering) boat.
    • Captains of towed vessels should remain aware of using the propulsion, and the combination of forces acting on the hull.
    • The use of a shot string (standard on single propulsion, advisable on double propulsion vessels) helps to keep the towing wire on the aft ship centrally positioned and avoids girting, the towing point being brought to the aft of the ship instead of on the pivot point of the tug. See example in Fig. 2.
Illustration of ideal towing arrangement

Figure 2 – Illustration of ideal towing arrangement

Latest Safety Flashes:

MAIB: Sinking of tug Biter with loss of two lives

MAIB has published Accident Investigation 17/2024 relating to the girting and capsize of tug Biter with the loss of two lives.

Read more
Dropped object – strop parted over sharp edge

A cylinder was lifted to a height of approximately 6 metres over deck of the vessel, the sharp steel edges of the cylinder cut through the firehose protection and caused the strop to part.

Read more
Person injured when pry bar slipped

A crew member who was applying downward pressure to their pry bar to lift a track, fell towards the deck when the pry bar slipped.

Read more
MSF: High potential near miss during FRC maintenance

The Marine Safety Forum has published Safety Alert 26-01 relating to an incident where there was an unplanned lowering of an FRC to the sea

Read more
BSEE: Crane incident leads to serious facial injuries

BSEE has published Safety Alert 512 relating to a crane incident during well abandonment which led to a worker being struck and suffering serious facial injuries.

Read more

IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.

The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.

All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.

IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.

The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.

Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.