Equipment on quay damaged when vessel started listing
- Safety Flash
- Published on 10 February 2022
- Generated on 17 March 2026
- IMCA SF 04/22
- 3 minute read
During an inspection using a “cherry picker,” the vessel slowly listed, causing the pipelay tower to come into contact with the cherry picker basket.
What happened?
During inspection of two pad eyes on a Tiltable Lay System (TLS) using a “cherry picker” or mobile elevated work platform on the quayside, the vessel slowly listed, causing the pipelay tower to come into contact with the work basket on the cherry picker. The hand rail on the work basket was damaged.
It is not thought that the “cherry picker” could have toppled over, due to the minimal reach of the basket and the fact that the load caused by the vessel was being absorbed by the deformation of the hand rail on the basket.
Photos
What went wrong?
Investigation determined:
- There was no Permit to Work (PTW) for the task – no control of work on the quayside or assessment of vessel Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPs).
- The Task Risk Assessment (TRA) did not include:
- SIMOPS hazards of potential listing of vessel due to crane movements or wash from other vessels.
- hazard of the “cherry picker” work basket being close to the vessel structure and clashing with it.
- The different toolbox talks takin place did not discuss the other simultaneous tasks occurring;
- The person operating the “cherry picker” had no valid training for it.
What went right?
The platform on the pipelay tower was accessible from the work basket. Crew in the work basket made the decision to exit the basket onto the tower and did so in a safe and controlled manner, unclipping from the basket and clipping onto the pipelay platform before climbing across.
What was the cause?
Uncontrolled simultaneous operations: during the pad eye inspection the vessel was observed to slowly list towards the quayside due to a vessel crane movement.
Actions
- Ensure Permit to Work is required for non-routine hazardous Working at Height tasks i.e. for tasks where routine established procedures are not in place and in use. Worksite management should be responsible for determining on a case by case basis when a Permit to Work is required for working at height tasks.
- Review and update Task Risk Assessments to include potential for vessel movement and communication of SIMOPS activities.
- Ensure that all work that can be impacted by deck activities, is highlighted and discussed at cross-departmental TBTs.
- Have an effectively practiced and drilled plan for emergency rescue when anyone is working at height.
- If unsure of the correct method to execute a task, or the associated risks, STOP the JOB and ASK!
Members may wish to refer to:
- IMCA M203 Guidance on simultaneous operations (SIMOPS)
Related Safety Flashes
-
IMCA SF 23/21
19 August 2021
-
IMCA SF 10/21
8 April 2021
-
-
IMCA SF 04/21
2 February 2021
-
IMCA Safety Flashes summarise key safety matters and incidents, allowing lessons to be more easily learnt for the benefit of the entire offshore industry.
The effectiveness of the IMCA Safety Flash system depends on the industry sharing information and so avoiding repeat incidents. Incidents are classified according to IOGP's Life Saving Rules.
All information is anonymised or sanitised, as appropriate, and warnings for graphic content included where possible.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, but is not be liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
The information contained in this document does not fulfil or replace any individual's or Member's legal, regulatory or other duties or obligations in respect of their operations. Individuals and Members remain solely responsible for the safe, lawful and proper conduct of their operations.
Share your safety incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive Safety Flashes straight to your email.