Use of third-party equipment leads to DP undesired event
- DP Event
- Published on 30 November 2018
- Generated on 26 December 2024
- DPE 04/18
- 2 minute read
Undesired event
DP equipment should not be repaired and brought online after repair without being suitably tested.
Comments
The UPS and the DGNSS source does not fall under the vessel’s planned maintenance system (PMS), as this is owned by the survey company. The equipment is maintained and tested before it is installed on a vessel.
While the testing of signal dropout and UPS function is part of the vessel’s DP checklists, there is no electrical maintenance or routine testing on the specific UPS while in service onboard; the backup strategy is to keep a spare UPS onboard.
Redundancies worked as designed; no critical situation developed. Drilling operations suspended purely due to loss of redundancy.
An additional checklist to routinely test the capabilities of the UPS was developed and implemented as part of the vessel PMS.
Considerations
- The online position reference systems (PRS), 3 x DGNSS, do not provide adequate redundancy according to industry guidance.
- Considering the time taken to select the taut wire it appears ‘stand-by’ meant that the depressor weight was still on deck and not deployed.
- Reference should be made Guidance on operational activity planning (IMCA M220).
- The report indicates that two of the PRSs were supplied with power from a UPS that was not designated for the DP system.
- The DP FMEA should be revisited to verify the effects of failures of the DP UPSs and the power distribution supplying the UPSs. It should be verified that the arrangements, the UPS endurance and the PRS set up for the industrial mission are in accordance with the DP Class 2 requirements.
- DP equipment should not be repaired and brought online after repair without being suitably tested.
- A proper assessment should be made, and MoC procedure followed when connecting third party equipment to the DP system.
- Reference should be made to Guidelines on the shared use of sensors for survey and positioning purposes (IMCA M235).
Latest DP incidents
-
Prepare for 2025 solar activity
This case study covers events that occurred on the same vessel, eight months apart.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
Know your vessel capabilities and when to stop!
An incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Duty/not duty, which is the question?
With no steering control of the port azimuth thruster, and no other thrusters operational, the heading of the FPU could not be maintained.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
You’ve got the ASOG, so now you’ve got to follow it
This case study examines an incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Button trouble
A Dynamically Positioned vessel experienced a loss of Dynamic Positioning (DP) control while installing cable within a wind farm.
DPE 01/24
3 April 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.