Thruster command and feedback differences
- DP Event
- Published on 2 November 2017
- Generated on 22 February 2025
- DPE 04/17
- 2 minute read
Incident
Jump to:
It was concluded that the fault had to be in the output control loop, and it was decided to replace items with spares held on board.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5d9a/c5d9a5a8518a05169699e4f1cbd48d201bc56a95" alt="DPE 17.04 – Thruster command and feedback differences leads to DP incident – Flowchart DPE 17.04 – Thruster command and feedback differences leads to DP incident – Flowchart"
Comments
The DP system reported a thruster pitch prediction error when a large difference between the command and feedback was detected at 20:35:34. The description for a thruster prediction alarm states that the operator must take action to determine if the alarm is caused by a faulty feedback signal (DP performance nearly unaffected) or a faulty command signal (DP performance affected).
The port azimuth thruster was not stopped and only momentarily deselected from DP. The thruster gave thrust in the wrong direction while it was running and the DP system was unable to maintain position.
The prediction alarm went to normal again at 20:51:04 and the DP system was able to maintain position. No problems were reported after this.
Since the command output from the DP control system was correct, it was concluded that the fault had to be in the output control loop. It was decided to replace items in the command loop with spare parts held on board.
Trials and DP tests were carried out to verify system after replacement of parts. No problems or findings to report.
Considerations
- The reason for reselecting the errant thruster must be questioned.
- In this situation stopping the errant thruster should have allowed the DP system to regain control.
- Event box No.2 (pitch command and feedback mismatch indication) provides the trigger to stop the thruster because it indicates there is a problem with thruster commands.
Latest DP incidents
-
Thorough preparation is key
With 4 of 8 diesel generators running and connected to a closed ring bus, and 7 of the 8 thrusters selected to DP, a DP equipment class 3 MODU was set up in Green mode whilst on standby.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
There – but not really there
This DP event occurred on a DP equipment class two supply vessel whilst carrying out cargo operations on the starboard side alongside the asset and working at the lee side in the drift-off position.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Equipment Class 3, even if you operate as 'Class 2'
This case study examines a DP incident on an equipment class 3 multi-purpose vessel while operating in good conditions.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Line of sight
This case study covers events onboard a DP equipment class 2 vessel whilst holding position in a turbine field, with three position reference systems selected into DP – DGPS, HPR and Fanbeam.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
DP Drill Scenario
DP emergency drill scenarios are included to assist DP vessel management, DPOs / Engineers, and ETOs in conducting DP drills onboard.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.