Routine maintenance leads to loss of thruster
- DP Event
- Published on 29 May 2018
- Generated on 22 February 2025
- DPE 02/18
- 2 minute read
Undesired event
Jump to:
When obtaining an oil sample, the valve was opened fully, reducing the pressure to the pressure switch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24841/24841af4d399ae8744bfe8d4e2d7e9287395da67" alt="DPE 18.02 – Routine maintenance leads to loss of thruster – DP Undesired Event – Flowchart DPE 18.02 – Routine maintenance leads to loss of thruster – DP Undesired Event – Flowchart"
Comments
During a routine weekly maintenance operation, a ships engineer took an oil sample from the starboard azimuth thruster sample point, which is a small valve located on the line to the pressure switch.
The location of the oil sample point on the line to the pressure switch creates a risk of inadvertently activating the switch if the sample valve is opened too much. When obtaining the sample, the valve was opened fully, reducing the pressure to the pressure switch.
The pressure switch then tripped causing the thruster to stop; the oil pressure in the thruster was maintained and not at risk. Once the sample valve was closed the pressure on the line to the pressure switch returned to normal.
The starboard azimuth was started back up in DP and, following a short investigation, pre-dive checks were carried out and the bell deployed to continue diving operations.
Considerations
- The loss of redundancy should have initiated a yellow alert but this was not in the report.
- Planned maintenance of critical equipment should be controlled by a permit to work (PTW) system.
- It appears that during the event, co-operation between the bridge, engine room and diving departments was good.
- The event highlights a poor design, for example the sample point could have been down stream of the oil pressure sensor and in this situation, it would seem reasonable for an alarm to be triggered rather than the thruster shut down.
Latest DP incidents
-
Thorough preparation is key
With 4 of 8 diesel generators running and connected to a closed ring bus, and 7 of the 8 thrusters selected to DP, a DP equipment class 3 MODU was set up in Green mode whilst on standby.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
There – but not really there
This DP event occurred on a DP equipment class two supply vessel whilst carrying out cargo operations on the starboard side alongside the asset and working at the lee side in the drift-off position.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Equipment Class 3, even if you operate as 'Class 2'
This case study examines a DP incident on an equipment class 3 multi-purpose vessel while operating in good conditions.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Line of sight
This case study covers events onboard a DP equipment class 2 vessel whilst holding position in a turbine field, with three position reference systems selected into DP – DGPS, HPR and Fanbeam.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
DP Drill Scenario
DP emergency drill scenarios are included to assist DP vessel management, DPOs / Engineers, and ETOs in conducting DP drills onboard.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.