Load sharing imbalance causes loss of position
- DP Event
- Published on 29 March 2017
- Generated on 26 December 2024
- DPE 01/17
- 2 minute read
Incident
The vessel’s DP operations manual and well specific operating guidelines (WSOG) must be questioned.
Comments
The power plant was configured to work in closed bus mode. No.2 port, No.2 centre and No.2 starboard generator were online. No.1 port and No.1 centre generator were on standby. No.1 starboard generator was on long term isolation due to turbocharger overhaul.
The vessel’s power management system (PMS) developed a fault in an I/O module for No.2 centre generator. This fault caused the generator circuit breaker status to freeze in the ‘closed’ position. The alarm indicated a generator fault causing the engineer to disconnect the faulty generator.
The breaker opened on the generator and due to the fault on the I/O module the status of the breaker was still showing connected and a load sharing imbalance was noticed by the PMS which attempted to correct it. As the disconnected generator could not take any load, the imbalance persisted and the PMS drove the bus frequency down to the point where it triggered the frequency based thrust limitation function on all thrusters leading to loss of position and an emergency disconnect.
Considerations
- It is recommended that the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) should consider the PMS interface so that this type of failure mode is identified.
- It would appear the PMS was not properly tested for operations in closed bus tie operations.
- The fact that frequency issues occurred suggests advance generator protection was either not present or not functioning correctly.
- The vessel’s DP operations manual and well specific operating guidelines (WSOG) must be questioned.
- The value of the current factor (3.9kts) should be questioned.
- It should be noted that when thrusters are operated via the IJS they are still under the control of the PMS.
Latest DP incidents
-
Prepare for 2025 solar activity
This case study covers events that occurred on the same vessel, eight months apart.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
Know your vessel capabilities and when to stop!
An incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Duty/not duty, which is the question?
With no steering control of the port azimuth thruster, and no other thrusters operational, the heading of the FPU could not be maintained.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Undesired event
-
You’ve got the ASOG, so now you’ve got to follow it
This case study examines an incident that occurred on an equipment class 2 MODU, during well intervention operations.
DPE 02/24
29 July 2024
Incident
-
Button trouble
A Dynamically Positioned vessel experienced a loss of Dynamic Positioning (DP) control while installing cable within a wind farm.
DPE 01/24
3 April 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.