Inadequate shallow water lay-up reactivation procedures
- DP Event
- Published on 30 November 2018
- Generated on 22 February 2025
- DPE 04/18
- 1 minute read
Undesired event
Jump to:
The heat exchange system was poorly designed, without redundancy for half the switchboard. This was compounded by turbidity and silt in the cooling system.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/293f2/293f2f564f87b0f0c791c68199b38644029962b4" alt="DPE 18.04 – Inadequate shallow water lay up reactivation procedures – Flowchart DPE 18.04 – Inadequate shallow water lay up reactivation procedures – Flowchart"
Comments
The heat exchange system is poorly designed and without redundancy for half of the switchboard. Design flaws were compounded by the introduction of turbidity and silt into the cooling system.
The vessel was idle for some time in shallow water and the systems were not adequately preserved.
There was biological fouling taking place on the heat exchangers. Although multiple heat exchanger cleanings had occurred, the system was not adequately flushed to remove the fouling.
Considerations
- The report indicates that although the cooling systems were cleaned prior to reactivation they had not been properly flushed and were therefore unable to perform to full capacity.
- It is important that all redundant systems are able to perform to full capacity following loss of a redundant group. If not, there is a potential to exceed the WCFDI following a failure.
- Performance tests should be part of the reactivation procedures after an idle period in shallow water.
Latest DP incidents
-
Thorough preparation is key
With 4 of 8 diesel generators running and connected to a closed ring bus, and 7 of the 8 thrusters selected to DP, a DP equipment class 3 MODU was set up in Green mode whilst on standby.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
There – but not really there
This DP event occurred on a DP equipment class two supply vessel whilst carrying out cargo operations on the starboard side alongside the asset and working at the lee side in the drift-off position.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Equipment Class 3, even if you operate as 'Class 2'
This case study examines a DP incident on an equipment class 3 multi-purpose vessel while operating in good conditions.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Line of sight
This case study covers events onboard a DP equipment class 2 vessel whilst holding position in a turbine field, with three position reference systems selected into DP – DGPS, HPR and Fanbeam.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
DP Drill Scenario
DP emergency drill scenarios are included to assist DP vessel management, DPOs / Engineers, and ETOs in conducting DP drills onboard.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.