Change of heading leads to DP incident
- DP Event
- Published on 25 February 2020
- Generated on 22 February 2025
- DPE 01/20
- 2 minute read
Incident
Further investigation revealed the overspeed settings were too tight and had to be increased in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendation.
Comments
The vessel had been on DP for the whole day and in order to lift the ROV on deck with the crane, vessel heading had to be changed 15 degrees away from the wind.
This caused a high load on two running bow thrusters and the third bow thruster was started, selected to DP and successfully shared the load. Increased windward force on the vessel due to high wind velocity acting on it as it changed heading, caused all the three bow thrusters to trip on overspeed with no DP or thrusters’ control system alarms.
Further investigation revealed the overspeed settings were too tight and had to be increased in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendation.
Considerations
- It is not clear why the additional bow thruster was not put online before the heading change.
- A simulated alteration of heading and or referring to the vessel’s capability plots should have been considered to ensure that the heading change could have been performed within vessel’s DP capability.
- The overspeed trip of all thrusters during DP operations shows inadequate initial commissioning and full power testing during the FMEA proving trials and annual DP trials and following any modification.
- This incident further highlights the importance of equipment protection settings with respect to DP redundancy concept, in addition to equipment safety. DP FMEAs require to consider the effects of equipment protection system on the wider DP redundancy concept.
- Reference: Guidance on Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA) (IMCA M166).
Latest DP incidents
-
Thorough preparation is key
With 4 of 8 diesel generators running and connected to a closed ring bus, and 7 of the 8 thrusters selected to DP, a DP equipment class 3 MODU was set up in Green mode whilst on standby.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
There – but not really there
This DP event occurred on a DP equipment class two supply vessel whilst carrying out cargo operations on the starboard side alongside the asset and working at the lee side in the drift-off position.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Equipment Class 3, even if you operate as 'Class 2'
This case study examines a DP incident on an equipment class 3 multi-purpose vessel while operating in good conditions.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
Line of sight
This case study covers events onboard a DP equipment class 2 vessel whilst holding position in a turbine field, with three position reference systems selected into DP – DGPS, HPR and Fanbeam.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
-
DP Drill Scenario
DP emergency drill scenarios are included to assist DP vessel management, DPOs / Engineers, and ETOs in conducting DP drills onboard.
DPE 03/24
5 November 2024
Incident
The case studies and observations above have been compiled from information received by IMCA. All vessel, client, and operational data has been removed from the narrative to ensure anonymity. Case studies are not intended as guidance on the safe conduct of operations, but rather to assist vessel managers, DP operators, and technical crew.
IMCA makes every effort to ensure both the accuracy and reliability of the information, but it is not liable for any guidance and/or recommendation and/or statement herein contained.
Any queries should be directed to DP team at IMCA. Share your DP incidents with IMCA online. Sign-up to receive DP event bulletins straight to your email.